Backtesting Forecasters: A Minimal, Repeatable Template

Published on January 1, 2026
Backtesting Forecasters: A Minimal, Repeatable Template

What “backtesting forecasters” means

Backtesting a forecaster means measuring their historical performance using a fixed scoring methodology.

The goal is to answer:

• is this performance real skill

• does it generalize over time

• how does it compare to a baseline like base rate or market consensus

The trap: changing rules after you see results

The easiest way to fake a great backtest is to tweak settings until it looks good.

To avoid that, you need a template with fixed definitions that you apply repeatedly.

That is why methodology disclosure matters. See Scorecard Methodology.

The minimal backtest template

Use this template as a checklist. If you cannot fill a field, your backtest is not ready.

1) Define the dataset

• date range (start and end)

• eligible questions or markets (categories, exclusions)

• event type (binary only or multi class)

• how you handle voids and disputes

2) Define the forecast selection rule

This is the most important part.

• score final forecast before settlement

• or score the forecast at an evaluation checkpoint (recommended)

Example: “score the last forecast at T-24h.”

3) Define the metric

Pick one primary metric:

• Brier score for binary

• optionally log loss as secondary

State whether each market is equally weighted.

4) Define the benchmark

To make results comparable, define a benchmark and compute skill:

• base rate benchmark (default)

• market consensus benchmark (only with liquidity filters)

Then compute Brier skill score:

BSS = 1 - (BS / BS_ref)

5) Define quality and anti gaming rules

• minimum sample size (N)

• minimum coverage against eligibility

• horizon splits or checkpoint only

• liquidity filters if you use market consensus

6) Define reporting outputs

Minimum outputs:

• BS overall

• BSS vs base rate

• N and coverage

• calibration table with buckets and N per bucket

Optional but strong:

• rolling windows trend

• breakdown by category

A concrete example you can copy

• Dataset: all binary markets in categories A and B from Oct 1 to Dec 31

• Checkpoint: T-24h before settlement

• Metric: Brier score, equal weight per market

• Benchmark: category base rate for BSS

• Filters: require N at least 50 and coverage at least 30%

• Output: overall BS and BSS, plus bucket table and rolling 30 day chart

Common mistakes

Using final forecasts: rewards late updates. If you want skill, use checkpoints.

No coverage reporting: allows cherry picking and selection bias.

Benchmark drift: changing benchmark definition breaks comparability.

Ignoring thin markets: market baselines can be noisy without liquidity filters.

Takeaway

A good backtest is boring: fixed dataset rules, fixed checkpoint rule, a primary metric, a benchmark, and clear reporting of N and coverage. If you can run the same template every month without changing definitions, your scorecard becomes credible.

Related

• Out of Sample Testing

• Evaluation Checkpoints

• Selection Bias and Coverage

• Benchmarking Against the Market

← Back to Guides